Further to the Advance Policy Notice, I question why a Supreme Court Justice even would uphold this policy because of clause #8? And it appears here that the Court would enforce it if need be, meaning that should it even go to court wasting the courts money and Judges time? IMO, it should not even have to go to court to see whether this is a legal document or not.

Also, if a document is not so clear as to need an interpretation, how can it be valid? If a policy needs the interpretation of a judge, it can,t be very effective and shows the futility of the policy, because anyone engaging the policy would have to wait for an arbitration that could not be discerned on their own accord. The problem arises and ends at the point of opinion, if a lawyer says its a legal document, and a Judge says it isn,t, how can something ever really be legal when its decided by opinion?

IMO

This below is from the Advance Notice Policy published on SEDAR.

GOVERNING LAW