The point I am trying to get across in the diagrams, is that we DID drill into the pink of our anomaly. If you compare the two photos, you will see numerous intercepts symbolized by the red and gold horizontal spikes coming from the drill hole in the Goldquest photo. If you look at the SLI photo, you will see that there is no reported intercepts from the orange to the pink color in that photo. The point being, that sulphides set off the orange to pink colors in our geophysics because we can correlate that from the C-1 slide that corresponds with sulphides. To see nothing showing up in the bottom of hole #10 is ridiculous, when we have as high as 5.7% sulphides showing up on the property, and knowing that gold is associated with the sulphides to the degree of 2-3 ozs per ton, or approx 96 g/t .

1) this is a sample from the A-4 vein at the 40m level of ANDESITE, this sample yeilded 8620 ppm or ~8000 g/t copper and 3.19 g/t gold. Keep in mind, this is not really the quartz veins that bear gold, but the andesite of which there are numerous dykes of on the property.

1)JB A1-3 A4 NC NC 10 -1.5 40 channel 215 andesite, fresh 3.19 0.09 8620

2) this is a sample from the A-4 vein of fault gouge, this material had 8.45 grade g/t gold in it with 4750 ppm or ~4700 g/t copper. If you look at the appropriate quantec slide for the A-4 vein,Line L 5000 you will see no corresponding near surface high chargeability because the Quantec was taken across the vein and needed to be at least 5m wide before the A-4 vein would even register on that Quantec slide. Unlike the C-1, where it is so easy to see the width of the mineralization that leads to the anomaly, BECAUSE, the L5750 slide layed on top of the C-1vein for around 100m,s length, therefore a correlation signature was born that can be applied as proof to the rest of the Quantec. Note, this is not the only proof test, but is the most easiest to see. Nevertheless, both these veins, the A-4 and C-1 can be seen leading to the giant anomaly and carry appreciative sulphides that confidently suggest that the anomaly HAS to be made of at least the same grade of sulphide, and none if this is showing up in samples.

2) A1-1 A4 NC NC 10 -1.5 55 channel 215 gouge, reddish, w/1-cm qv at centre 8.45 0.25 4750

IMO