Sculpin, are you suggesting they did not assay the entire 500.2 M of the core from hole DDH_TE_10?

Do you like what you see @ the 64 M level? I do!

IMO, I think I'd like it a whole lot better from about 250 - 500M

If that truly is where that hole was drilled, and you go to the 43101, and look at the General Remarks for T16, the last sentence said this:

This may be indication of deep mineralization, alteration or structures.