Its ridiculous from many standpoints why Lori and gang continue this sharade to wear down the SLI treasury after so many red flags have been raised with this investment over the last couple years. Surely Lori knows that it is over, and these continuing futile attempts are only seen as further black marks against her credibilty and grace, not even mentioning the credibilty of her current support, in which I see little. How could there be ample support for Lori and current management,(excluding Murry), who in their right mind as an investor or accountable participant, condone action after action of what can easily be seen as "not in the best interests of shareholders"? What are these supporters really thinking, to OK irrational travel expenses, little to no advancement of properties optioned to IGD, etc, etc, etc,. Its ludicrous to think even one person would support that kind of performance.

Why would a company sink 500m hole after 500m hole if they were finding nothing? To pursue a scenario like this, if they really did find nothing, may suggest complete incompetence in spending investors money foolishly. If they did find considerable mineralization, like I think, then why release such incomplete and dismal results? It doesn,t matter which way you look at it, the end result is the same, the capability of running this company becomes the most serious question that is in every investors minds and should also be in the few supporters minds of Lori as well.

All the results released this year, drilling and trenching, are the most unprofessional presentation I have ever seen. An investor doesn,t have to be very well educated to see this, let alone the professionals. Each one of you, if you desire, take a little bit of the historic data, most notably the C-1 and A-4 adits data, the corresponding geophysics, and ask a geo you may know, of their opinion of the anomalies to where these adits connect. Although samples are usually 2-5kg, and are representative of a grade extended to portray in tonnage, the 4 ton sample taken from the A-4 vein averaged 11 ounces per ton! That is a very large sample and portrays the richness of that vein, throw the narrow vein concept out the window, that we hear time and time again, its BS! The Quantec doesn,t see narrow veins, it sees something big to where these veins meets! These anomalies are not comprised of little singular narrow veins with wide spacing between them, these anomalies are depositions in the shape of ovoids or cylindrical structures that have numerous veins running through them like the "blow outs" suggested in historical data, you would not get that type of geophysical response if that were the case. And again, take from the corporate presentation, and mentioned elsewhere in historic data, the fact that the C-1 vein averaged 1 ounce per ton gold in development material. This is a huge sample and is representative of a mining grade which just happens to be 4 TIMES above what is presently required for a mine to be economical! The highest sample to come from the C-1, a 2-5 kg sample, also graded 11 ounces per ton or just above!

I would love to know and speak with, any geo,s on the exchange or sec commission that have reviewed the drill and trenching releases that have come out in the last year.

All in my opinion, but I do know, this is the opinions of others as well.

http://agoracom.com/ir/steliasmines/forums/discussion/topics/556002-anomaly/messages/1749860#message

http://agoracom.com/ir/steliasmines/forums/discussion/topics/555826-comparison-of-2-anomalies/messages/1749345#message