By looking at all historical data, there appears to be supporting documentation of economical copper grades being a good possibility, along with the gold. Although near surface samples, for example, from surface to 80m down, are showing limonite/ cufe sulfer oxides, below the 80m level, these oxidized minerals should become pure, giving more distinct readings of copper. It is very puzzling to me why we are not seeing any samples of the drill core for CU (copper), when we have an historical sample high of 4.5% copper taken from around 40-100m level of the C-1, and another sample from older work at 5.7% copper. As with the gold surface samples, this suggests a rich source below, and the shape of some of our anomalies are porphry shape and tear drop shape, suggesting plutonic intrusions of minerals. You cannot have these high of mineral grades without the sources being close by, these sample grades are not taken from alluvium, they are taken from the host rock and part of the mineral source, common sense alone would suggest the source to be underneath.

IMO of course.