Well let's see how many assumptions you make in your post -

"conspiracy theories" - your assumption and label

"a handful of others" - you're nuts if you think there's a handful that are unhappy with what has happened with this company and AGREE with Sculpin - I am not sure what research you have done, but your glib bs is offensive.

"stick to the facts" - what facts do you have?? do you have all the answers that shareholders are asking?? how much research have you done?

"wild assumptions" - back atcha -

"credibility" - Sculpin has more credibility in his little finger than you have ever shown here. I wish you well with finding some.

"Call Murry" - and talk about you? no thanks when I talk to Murry we have better things to talk about.

"and no agenda" - wow, really??? That doesn't sound very honest at all - this whole post wreaks of having an agenda.