Its becoming apparent that the new IR guy may not be up to speed yet with what has been happening with the company. I see by certain answers to questions that Dan may have a little more homework to do. May I suggest that he goes back over all the NR,s and historical data so that he doesn,t find himself in a contradictory scenario to past statements/facts presented by the company? If he is answering valid questions, do these questions not deserve a more factual and foundational reply? If his answers are contradictory to past fact, wouldn,t this lessen his credibilty and could be harmful to the company in securing new investors?

We shouldn,t be too harsh on him yet, he is most likely only trying to do his best. I don,t believe we can expect for him to jump in and start answering such intricate questions immediately, but also, if he doesn,t know the answer, maybe he should just say that he doesn,t know?

IMO