I don,t really know what to think of the statement made by Jeff that the drills will again be turning, shortly. There is, and still more to come from the previous work, assays that needed to be compiled and it was said, see where we go from there. Now we are still waiting on numerous holes, with 3 or 4 holes probably just getting to the lab a few days ago. Turn around for assays for us seems to be taking 4-6 months. Compilation from the first drill results seems to be taken 4-6 months. How can we move forward without having this compiled information? Then I think of this picture from Quantec,if you look at the first color diagram on this link of the chargeability anomaly depicted there, you will see that the Quantec is suggesting a very high degree of accuracy, with little to no fine tuning. Also, if you look at the size of the depicted anomaly, you will see that one drill hole through an anomaly is pretty much all that is needed, because of the distance one drill hole covers. To have to fine tune, seems irrelevant to me.

http://www.quantecgeoscience.com/technology/titan24

Our anomalies have been tuned before we were given the data, eliminating noise and dimishing the possibility for artifacts on the chargeability slides.If we take this a step further and plot the C-1 vein on the corresponding Titan chargeability slide, we can see the known length of that adit fitting perfectly on one of the anomalies, suggesting over 90% accuracy for that chargeability anomaly. This anomaly is 1 of ten tested responses of the Titan on the property, further suggesting extreme accuracy.To drill these anomalies and get little or nothing, seems impossible, therefore, I would expect some excellent results from most of the holes reported on to date, when they are completely assayed, and the many other holes that haven,t been reported on yet.

If good results do not materialize, then we have a huge problem. It could mean that the Quantec is not right, which would cause a lot of problems for them and the industry participants that rely on them. Also, all the different geo,s that have worked on the site, may have their work questioned. Also Dynacor and Chorunga would have to be in question, see where I am going with this? This is why the Quantec is not wrong and the geos are not wrong and Dynacor and Chorunga,are not wrong. Whats wrong, is that the results to date don,t seem to be matching up with all historical data. The results to date are not matching up because they appear to be merely tests of the core and not full assays.I expect we have some very good results coming very shortly, if we don,t, then its defying every aspect of the junior mining exploration process.

So, I believe Lori has some really good stuff for us, lets see what happens.

IMO