So, we have Mr T coining a new term for large geophysical targets.

1)We have anomomly #1 that is 1800m long x 1700m wide X 1300m thick(open to depth?)

2)We have anomoly #2 that is 800 long X 1000m wide X 300m thick

3)We have anomoly #3 that is in the Zona Incognito area, which is the third smallest anomoly, I am not even gonna bother looking up the size of this one now for this post.

4)We have a total of 19 near surface high priority targets/anomolies.

5)We have 26 secondary near surface second priority targets/anomolies.

6)We have 12 major lineaments/faults associated to large scale shear zones.

7) We have 36 secondary lineaments/faults that are determined to be small gradient zones.

8) We have 10 considered tested anomolies, Z-1 to Z-10 that are in the main structural corridor, with the highest grade of gold being around 19 ozs from one sample, and a consistant average gold grades of ~ 1 oz per ton in another of these zones. There are a lot more tested responses, but I know I don,t have to continue, you get the picture.

9) The shear zones mentioned in point 6), probably should be classed as tested responses and may already be, I am not gonna take the time to check. The utmost importance of these shear zones is, these are made up of rock that has been considerably disturbed and carry disseminated gold as one of the higher averages being around 2 g/t reported in one area, with an exceptional narrow width sample taken from the Zona Sur area around 39 g/t. The statement that these zones are "large scale " are indicative of open pit host rock that does not need the veins to be economical, although gold bearing veins among this, boosts the overall average grade, becoming the gravy, if you will.

I could go on here all day, and maybe for a couple days, showing everyone why these anomolies cannot be artifacts, but I wont. Common sense should tell anyone that Quantec is not gonna deliver data that has a high chance of being faulty, the large miners would not use them, or it would be useless to any miner that decides to use this technology. The facts that Quantec proudly boasts of the feats of their technology, like for instance, gettin down to 10km with their Spartan Technology and through meters of permafrost, which would be highly conductive. Yet, they are able to filter out the noise from the permafrost and get accurate readings. Below is a link to an accurate reading of a chargeability anomoly, very much like the ones we have on Tesoro, take a peak at the accuracy;

http://www.quantecgeoscience.com/technology/titan24

At this time, we should have enough data from the Tesoro to estimate millions of ounces of gold, and validate the Quantec readings at depth. Now, ~8 independent geos have looked at the data, with there opinions all coming back positive, that I know of. So, if the Quantec is not right, we have to forget everything geo,s ,science,historic data,geology,etc, know, and start anew, which for some reason, I don,t believe that will be the case. Oh, I just remembered one thing, I remember Lori telling the story at last years AGM how Kevin from Quantec first got our refined Quantec survey results. And how he was so excited and called a conference call with SLI, to tell them the signature/s from the survey were almost identical to Goldcorps, Red Lake deposit, one of the richest gold mines in North America, with an historic average grade of ~15 g/t, and a peak period of mining which saw an average gold grade of ~75 g/t. Recent geophysics there suggest more high grade gold with sulphides at depth and in another area, I believe.

So, you be the judge, are the anomolies artifacts, in the sense that they are not there, or did T-24 just coin a new description of large geophysical deposits?

Have a very nice day and a wild weekend!

IMO