T24, you know that Quantec practices QA/QC like any company, and they are among the top respected firms in the industry. To try and tell us that the anomoly is an inversion artifact when it states that measures are taken to limit this possibility, plus there is validation by comparing the known(like the C-1 complex) or the ten tested responses, known as Z-1 to Z-10, it all comes down to, "who are you trying to fool"?

I had, proof upon proof here today to refute everything you said, but I couldn,t get it pasted.

I will agree with you if you said what you said 20 years ago, but the science has progressed considerably since then.