Of course I admit the results are incomplete, MrsCramer, because the latest news release says so. Results from holes 36 to 43 are pending. Why bother doing a comparison? Because the original premise of this thread suggested that since Arequipa was bought out after 29 holes and St. Elias had 43, that there was enough data for an offer to become formal.So if there’s data enough for a buy-out offer a-la Arequipa right now, why isn’t is fair to compare the drill results of both companies right now?Arequipa is commonly used as a speculative template for St. Elias’s future, yet people cry foul when a comparison of actual drill results between the two companies is posted? In all fairness, I don’t think you can have it both ways.