Hole #11, if plotted correctly, which I believe it is, should be through the A 1,2 and 3 veins. The azimuth (direction ie; east west etc) should have been westerly to cross the veins. If this is the case, it should have no less than 3 vein intercepts, yet it only shows one intercept at the 52m level of 30 cm tested @ 1.069 g/t gold. This drill hole went to 501.25 meters. The A-1 vein has had a surface sample between 15-30 g/t taken from it, A -2,3 had samples historically taken that assayed between 30.1- 97 g/t. So, if hole # 11 was drilled this way, there should be more info to come from that one that should be very interesting.

Important, you will notice in Hogs overlay it says that Lori said the silicious zones and alteration zones have not been tested yet in these drill cores. This means that our granodiorite/diorite, brecias, dykes, shear zones, etc, that may all carry anomolous gold have not been tested yet. We have had samples of these type of structures assaying high in historic sampling, so I wouldn,t be surprised when we get some half decent results from these sections of the cores, when assayed.

If we would have had the azimuth and dip of each hole, I could have did a guestimate of how many main veins per hole we should hit on the least. Without this,its all guess, and that leads to speculation again, so we need more facts. We have a drill plan , but we cannot connect any dots with it, because too much info is missing. The only way we will know if they are plotted correctly on the overlays we have done, is to get the actual coordinates of the drill collars.

IMO