I see there has been a little excitement over the drill plan that has been published on the web site. Its on the companies presentation link at the bottom of the home page, on page 20, FYI.

IMO, that is still not enough info to make any kind of decision on, but some may feel it is. To each their own, for me, I wait. Lori is well within her rights to with hold all results until Phase one drilling is complete and compiled. This may take a while longer and thats why we are longs, I guess. I think we are lucky, to some extent, that Lori gave us this much to look at to date, the test assays and now this vague drill map. She didn,t have to give us anything. But out of respect to the believers, a little something.

I am also still a strong believer of the Titan 24 and Quantec. I also suggest that you read the Geophysical Report portion of the latest 43-101. There seem to be so many references to the coorelations and consistency of the results with the mineral occurances( a summary and understanding on my part.)

Hole #4 looks like its in the anomaly. If you read the Geo report, I mentioned above, you will see on pg 114/ii, that it uses this conglomeration in a sentence "chargeability(mineralization)" . Now the pink in the anomaly on the drill plan image, is supposed to represent high chargeability at the 300m level, and if hole #4 hit that around that level, there should be some good stuff to come from that hole when we get it from the 300m level down. But I think Lori said she is focusing on hole #6 first.

IMO