I'm no pro at interpreting the results. But is it safe to assume that they did not actually sample all of the 241.5 m of hole #1? And possibly that they may have only taken a handful of specific samples at specific depths?

If that were the case, could these be the only samples of the X amount of results that contain more then 1 ppm?

It just makes cents that if they knew the Au content for the entire depth they could use simple math to round off number instead of 0.57 or 0.26m? Or make these numbers more impresive?

Not that I'm dissapointed. Just puzzled. Typical Lori style. Giving us something but really giving us nothing..... lol. Will be an interesting opening bell. Long and strong