You could be right on that Hobbes.

We were doing sampling last June that has not been reported on yet. But, if she had these unreported assays in hand that were not publicly reported on, she couldn,t have done the PP. So, that leaves me to beleive they were from drilling. Also, it was said that the samples from last june were mostly bulk and could not be taken from the property til May, when we received the EIS. But, it says in the financials that no bulk material was removed from the property before Aug 31st/2011.

So, I have talked myself into a circle, and have to go with my first instinct, that they are drill assays.