Re: Here is what I saw
in response to
by
posted on
Oct 20, 2011 03:28PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Very good post Sculpin and thanks for the clarification on what you saw.
" The fact that he says that the anomalies contain a high sulfide percentage of "over 1 %", and that that 1% is mostly gold..........."
And herein lies my problem. How does he know this, or does he know this ?
If he is privvy to information that is not public knowledge, SLI is going to be in a world of hurt, as Prime previously posted.
I tend to think he is speculating, and without drawing to the same conclusion that you have admirably led us to.
Personally I prefer BOW's (Blue Sky) numbers. Until the assays prove otherwise.
JMO