Hello Cdn, just got home from work and saw your post, as well as Sculpins & Hogs 4 posts following it up.

I'll just add my 2 cents worth, as far as the math goes, cause the geology side of it, I don't think many of us will compete with Sculpin & Hog!

Your comment (Cdn):

If this is true for our property why am I seeing calculations of so many grams/ton throughout a huge anomaly?

Also Sculpins Comment:

The anomaly looks like it is diorite/granodiorite. If it is, its most likely going to be mineralized to maybe the extent of 1 g/t, who knows maybe more.

When I do that math (predictive, speculative, whatever people want to call it?), I do use 1g/T BUT remember how much we are scaling everything by:

When you take the density scaling (2.5 instead of 2.75) & the 68% scaling (multiply by 0.32), really we are scaling down to a value of 29% from the original. Bottom Line we are saying :

• There is an average of 0.29 g/T over the entire Zona Central Anomaly Volume, or
• There is an average of 1g/T over 29% of the Zona Central Anomaly

That's right, as small as that seems, that's what gives you the 102 Million OZ. If we did not scale it, we would have over 350 Million OZ! I would never post that kind of number. But by scaling so much, I think that 102 Million OZ becomes very believable, or understandable, IMO.

It's hard to wrap our heads around just how huge the Zona Central Anomaly really is, and it's open at depth, which we are not at all accounting for either.

I hope this helps as well, or adds to Sculpin's & Hogs replies.