IMO, I don,t see why we have to do that extensive of a program. If we do, its great. It will prove up a lot of area, but if a sample is taken every 5 m, thats almost approx 20 km of trenching. I just don,t beleive we have to do that much sampling where we have the full Titan done. If the company wants to sell this fast, then focus on the area above the anomalies and by proving these areas, it should suffice.

The near surface Titan targets is where the trenching should be focused, and bulk samples will/should come from these areas as new veins are uncovered. This will be proof testing these areas and direct corellations can be drawn to the Titan, without too much sampling.

If she does want to do a thorough trenching program, this will undoubtedly prove up more gold over the entire property. But I ask the question, how much do we actually have to prove up if the giant anomaly gold estimate is at 70 million ounces?

Just my thoughts