The calculation I did, was simply to show the g/T to approx = $20 per share. There is absolutely no way I think the values would be that small (0.0722g/T). No doubt, not economical one bit. If it is, we're all done.

We've always said & used 1g/T (which hopefully is still conservative) but it makes the price per share just seem to unrealistic, maybe...?

Maybe a better way I should have shown it is:

1 g/T is 13.8 times bigger than the 0.0722 g/T that this $20 calculation worked out to.

Maybe I should have said even at 1g/T after scaling it by 1/2 already (Ovoid Formula), on only the 1 anomally, if you then scale it an additional 1/13.8 of the predicted OZ, you'd still get $20 per share approx value.

That's a whole bunch of scaling, just to make it = approx $20??