Thats what I,m saying!!! Awhile back I was looking at some surface samples from Zona Este and Zona sur, these are 2 areas where we have only took surface samples and dug some shallow trenches. These samples were not that impressive to the average person, but, if the average person would have looked a bit harder, they may have seen how really impressive they were. Im not good at computer graphics or explaining things, but I do understand things.

If you look on pg 250 of the technical report, fig 13-1 you will see Zona Este and a yellow dot indicating a sample was taken from this area. There were a couple samples taken from here, and if I remember correctly they were only around .75 g/t average. The important thing that the average person would miss here is;

There was a Quantec line that went right across that area and when I plotted the sample coordinates on that line, it showed the sample came from a non impressive area by looking at the quantec slides. If they would have went approx 50 yards east OR west, the would have been taking the sample from a mineralized zone and most likely had an impressive sample. They just missed.

So, if they had .75 in an area that didn,t register on the quantec, one should be able to assume they would have had a 5 g/t sample at least from the areas east and west that did register. The important thing here is that there is gold in the poor spots thats almost, if not economical. Do a quick grade average over that area and you have an average grade of 2.5 g/t! Thats over twice the gold grade needed for an open pit gold mine by todays POG.

This was one sample that was obvious, I have seen a couple more the same. If they would have had the Quantec done BEFORE sampling, I would say most samples would have came back excellent.

IMO.