A year ago I searched the above title and easily came up with a 3D geo. survey and then a yellow picture with the confirmed ore body from drill results; it was so identical I was very impressed. I searched and never found it again, but it dispelled any doubts I had that the geophysical results were very accurate in the delineation of a conductive substance. There are multiple cases histories, for example the Kidd creek mine that confirmed barren areas as well as positive drilling results, and also the barren drill results before the survey. I'm not sure if this is what Geer is referring to, but one can't ignore all the underground work and fantastic grades of samplings that have been done.

I don't mind Geer's critique when it is accurate, and I agree with many that aren't going to touch this stock until the assay results are confirmed. However risk-reward valuations are different for everybody. Unfortunately one can lose all your money on those safe 30 year bonds.