I would like to comment on your following phrase;

I know this has become more of a site for fanboys instead of intelligent conversation over the past while as everyone has gone crazy waiting for that drill permit but lets take the celebrating a little easy. Yes chargeability has outlined a potentially huge deposit but chargeability is not a measure of gold content and do not let anyone fool you into thinking so. Chargeability distinguishes sulphide contents, alteration and structures. This is stated directly in the latest technical report.

We have said on here in our discussions that CHARGEABILITY SIGNATURES are not representative of gold. WE did draw correlations between the sulfides and gold and broke down the grades via using the sample information. The sulfides here are an indicator of gold, and we have shown a DIRECT association. If you would have studied our work, you would have known this and may have been a "fan boy" yourself today.

Maybe the intelligence here is a little above your head, if you need help with understanding something, maybe ask the board.

We didn,t know what happened to you, the last we heard you had sold out at 1.73, did you miss out on the big run?