"i'm starting to think Jacobus results may not be there based on history"...

w6w I have thought the same thing. For SGX, in the past 'no news' has typically meant 'bad news' or at least non-extraordinary news. Completely agree. Big M results buried in MD&A was not good to see and because of the similar prolonged silence from the company I was wishing and wishing we did not see the same for GE drill results hidden in latest MD&A... and we didn't. That's a good thing LOL. Given that fact and given the surface results to date at GE I find it hard to believe GE results will be a complete dud. We can't forget there are many other positive reasons why the company may not be able to release or comment on anything but required documents at this stage. Likely why we have not seen so much as an exploration update with so much going on. In addition, I noticed the latest MD&A 'subsequent events' section did not include any additional details of exploration progress... and I am not talking about assays... it did not include any discussion whatsoever of ongoing exploration activities that was not previously released. Plus SGX has been more than reluctant to answer any questions via Agoracom... questions many of us here know they would have answered in a heartbeat in the past. I don't think for a second SGX would be doing this to peeve all of us off. All of these things adds up to an obvious (more than obvious) cone of silence surrounding SGX at this time. The reason for the silence?... Your guess is as good as mine.

red911