I spoke with Nigel Lees a short while back because I was wondering why the 'volitility' in the SP south of the border. The stock was showing 1.55 cents while in Canada it was 4.5-5 cents. Then I noticed it was 6.3 cents on the OTC when it was 4-4.5 on the TSX-V. Perhaps the SP was 'artificial' but in any case during my conversation with Nigel he said that he had just bought some more himself.

If Red or Longbomb had composed what poster Clinteroo commented on regarding Nigel's purchase of the stock, then I would have taken the words at face value but because of Clinteroos being prone to sarcastically throw harpoons at the company, I felt to comment on his post. Folks, it is NOT a case of "at least 'HE THINKS' it it is a good investment" as Clint says, because he, Nigel, does not stand alone. Many, many, others also believe that Sage Gold IS a good speculative investment. To comment as Clint did, "that his [Nigels] past record has not been good.." in that area, predisposes or comes with an innuendo that Nigel does not have enough faith in the project to put his own cash on the line. Then to throw in the not so positive, "but it is better than selling" takes from the positive nature of what Mr. Lees did and puts a 'quasi-negative twist' to it. Please note the words 'quasi negative twist' because that is what Clinteroo repeatedly does AND much more on the other forum. If what he has written on that forum [in the name of 'truth' and 'free speech'] was published here, he would have been long gone and he knows it. It is not a case of my being to picky and reading to much into what Clinteroo said, it is a case of decerning where this poster is coming from when you read his writings. If you doubt what I just wrote take a trip over to the other forum and read his past 'posts'.

Best wishes to those with the best of intentions,

Jerry Francis