Double halt? SGX-KXL... the reason I say this is because...

IF SGX channel samples (which started in Dec) were showing similar/identical grades/structure/etc. to KXL samples then is would be reasonable to assume this would represent confirmation of GM extension... SGX would likely be required/feel obligated to disclose this to KXL before public release because of the obvious dramatic impact such a confirmation would have on KXL (i.e. x3 x4 prevously disclosed strike length)... this would represent a significant 'material change'... would also be possible KXL and SGX agreed this info be withheld until KXL could also confirm up to its own border... plus with all QA delays... explains how we are here late July with still no results from either... mainly SGX sampling results... therefore, double halt to joint release massive extension could be possible IMO.

Possible? Maybe.

red911