At Big M, while trenching and stripping were still underway, we were told: "several zinc- and silver-rich float boulders were found"..."which may represent a zinc-copper core of a volcanogenic massive sulphide system"... "intersected up to 30 m of massive pyrite and pyrrhotite"... IMO very detailed accounts... Heck they even posted a picture of a sample from Big M with visible gold.

Versus... At SE Jacobus, with some trenching, stripping, and sampling complete and samples in the lab we have been told virtually nothing compared to descriptors and detail given for Big M. Sure we have been told of a mag low, a possible structural or lithological break, similar structures, and quartz veins with associated sulphides... but what about the samples? What do the samples look like?... nothing.

Maybe it means they found nothing? Could be, BUT if have yet to find anything of significance, I don't think we would be seeing and hearing phrases like 'mgmt is convinced' re: GM extension, continuously being reminded of the numerous quartx veins, and 'historical reports of gold bearing veins not assayed for gold'. If they have indeed found nothing yet IMO things would be extremely quiet... i.e. would certainly not be mentioned as it was in latest Nigel interview IMO.

For some reason SGX is reluctant to completely 'let the cat out of the bag' by deliberately choosing to not use 'visible gold' or any other more detailed descriptor to describe SE Jacobus channel samples... YET... until they absolutely have to... the question is why? We will eventally find out. IMO it will be worth the wait!

Just something to think about. Anyone have an answer?

red911