No question, CNBC has an agenda, I prefer RT for the real news.

Thanks for the link, brutus.

This is my favorite part of the article:

Yes, yes… the fundamentals. Were gold to actually back all of our current debt owned by foreigners it would be somewhere around $10,000. If it were to back all debt it would be well north of $20,000. …and if you include all of the guarantees, promises and future benefits? Well over $100,000. So we are being told that gold and silver are now “dead in the water” investments with no future at all. Everyone is so down trodden, scared and ready to commit the financial suicide that this “operation” was designed for in the first place. How many times in the past did they “shake the tree” like they are now? 10 times already? Why would the result be any different now other than the fact that there is now less gold available to deliver and more paper outstanding than previous “shakes.” How many times has “top” been called? “Bear market in gold and silver”?