It would seem to the advantage of an inventory seller, like Pinetree, to have an interest in seeing the prominent $1.20 resistant level fall. Today, anonymous, whomever they are, are more interested in keeping the share price below $1.20. I agree with many that there is something far more sinister being playing against us than the long sales. Is it not the duty of the board to safeguard owners against unfair play that so many believe has hurt us? More than likely the board feels that time and money is better spent on drilling and not in defending us in regards to the share price concerning who is trying to do what to us. Dave has said they have looked into the matter and they found no substance to support any wrong doing. Did they look at executed floor tickets and follow the trail of name changing so some sellers don't have to caugh up physical shares and thus may be counterfieting certificates? That's the real proof in the pudding in making a determination. Personally, I would like to know what avenue or avenues they pursued in coming up with the conclusion that no wrong doing has taken place against shareholders.