I agree. Goldhunter hit the nail on the head by bringing up the creation of another entity to put the chrome deposit in. For some reason unknown to me, company's names do not 100% of the time reflect their business. It's not easy for the perspective shareholder to make any sense out of Probe Mines, without researching further, than to think they either have properties or real mines of what? Sometimes tradition escapes the bigger picture.

What's wrong with Probe For Gold and Probe For Chrome? Now, a perspective buyer knows what each perspective company is basically all about without searching more. Some years back I read that each time gold rallied a company not gold affiliated but just had it in its name rallied as well. Even Goldfield with the symbol of GV on the old American Stock Exchange with gold mines in Nevada within or adjacent to the Walker Trend now is out of the business and was taken over for a shell but folks still think they are in the gold business because the name was left unchanged.

So, let's get with the program members of the board and let investors know what we are all about so, maybe, we can respect a truer valuation of our assets. Remember Jim Sinclair? His Tanzania business is searching for gold and flipping properties for royalties. Guess what his company's name is? Tanzania Exploration and Royalty couldn't be any clearer what business they are in for the folks who want it simple and there are plenty of them, they're called the public.