"Frank Carlucci" shouldn't be the token response to every question or issue that's presented.

I actually work in the financial services industry and I've seen start-up companies who are backed or owned by people who have a lot more power or clout than "Frank Carlucci" go belly-up.

I'd like to see discussions on topics like the actual technology Pluristem is creating, what are Pluristem's competitors doing, possible licensing oportunities and what Pluristem plans to do to counteract the inevitable negative pull on the SP after the RS.

I think always stating "I don't know but Frank Carlucci owns more than 4% of this company so we can't go wrong" sounds very naive. I would also bet that potential investors are "put-off" with this kind of statement.

Please don't be offended by my remark but I really do think we need to generate more intelligent discussions relating to Pluristem's actual technology. If we do this, we may pull in some experts in this field to join our discussion and liven up this board.

Have a great Thanksgiving!

Patientman