Right. Here are a few extracts with key points with emphapsis added.

"Their analysis of the Hay Mountain database led to the conclusion that there is a profound electromagnetic and magnetic anomalyin the same area as the main geochemical anomaly that has so far defined the Hay Mountain target in southeast Arizona."

Old news now, but important to repleat in light of additional confirmation.

“Because of my intimate and detailed knowledge of the stratigraphy (sedimentary beds) and geologic structure (folds, faults, volcanic features, and mineral features which follow fault structures) and penetrations by earlier drilling in a nearby area down to a few hundred feet, I was able to identify what appear to be profound and unexpected folding over the entire area. We have also identified strong northwest and northeast trending structural alignments that are not visible at the surface. These structural features are the structural alignments that appear in almost every porphyry copper in the Arizona–Sonora, Mexico-New Mexico porphyry copper province. Two of these alignments intersect near or over the geochemical and magnetic anomaly of our Hay Mountain target and form a strong resistivity low. Because the magnitude and complexity of these features were completely unexpected, they demand more interpretation and exact spatial correlation with surface geology, geochemistry and surface structural geology. I need to work closely with Geotech’s Chief Geophysicist to be sure our interpretations are as good as we can make them. Thus far the ZTEM data reinforces the conclusion that the Hay Mountain area hosts a porphyry copper style anomaly (magnetic and electromagnetic) superimposed on what appears to be an extremely complex geologic terrain. This is good news ..."

The word "profound" is used twice in this PR, it was used only once earlier. In the sencond instance, JB added "...profound and unexpected folding..." In my experience, this means there is further evidence for the presence of structural pathways which provide for the introduction of minerals from hydrothermal deposition, as would be expected for despoits matching producing mines having similar signatures.

In summary, this news appears to affirm and improve upon the initial ZTEM report. Note that somewhere in there is a suggestion that the old Tombstone workings could represent a feeder zone to Hay Mountain, meaning Hay Mountain could be much more significant than Tombstone. This, then lends support to JB's earlier talks suggesting that the whole of Bisbee is model for what could be at Hay Mountain.

My views, anyway. Lets see what others think.

VP in AZ