Much of this depends on whether one "thinks" their view is long term or short term. It takes $ and time to map, drill, assay and certify a large area like Big Chunk. Only after all that does the stock "pop" for a short time and then the "advance' that over-optimistic investors give fades away quickly, leaving a long time before production and profits (if any) begin. Gold is VERY volatile and unstable until well into the production cycle. Even GG still has its ups and downs. Uranium may be unglamorus but is far more dependable a commodity for us shareholders. If there is any wisdom, why not do more prep work in Alaska while the attention is in Arizona. Mitsu's view, I am certain, is very long term.