IHUB admin keeps removing my posts as off topic. I will post it here Posted by: LGJ In reply to: heybrad who wrote msg# 84601 Date:5/22/2014 7:11:04 AM Post #84602 of 84602 Heybrad, the main focus of my following the cases is to provide information for the EDIG Investors. Keeping track of the cases is the due diligence I provide. First and foremost, Handal is doing a superb job, in my opinion. They spanked Intel, and now Kingston, and I believe this action is setting a precedence and will continue as more cases unfold. Now, we wait and see. Handal is building a strong case against the defendants. Secondly, and not nearly as important, is your quest for proving or disproving Kingston asked for an Oral Argument. I provided documents proving Kingston requested a hearing on two different occasions. As a matter of fact, as far as the big picture is concerned, I consider this quest of yours self serving and useless for e.Digital. This seems to be only important to you... Honestly, who really cares but you? If you want to continue with your mission, by all means, go for it. I suggest getting a PACER account and downloading the documents yourself. FYI, so far it runs me about $100 dollars a quarter for the documents. Best of luck in your search. More importantly, as far as the shareholders are concerned, the courts decision to deny the motion to dismiss holds much more value to e.Digital and Handal, and the shareholders, than if Kingston asked for an Oral Argument of not...duh Order denying defendant motion to dismiss: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx9NLDCScshneXR1M2ZZYllGalU/edit?usp=sharing