LOL. John, how did I possibly slander Paul with this statement?

"Hope this helps you Paul...oops, I mean Greg."

You might want to look up the word slander in Webster's. And it certainly has not been proven that coolfool is not Paul. Why...just because he denies it? Paul has returned with so many new aliases that coolfool is probably just another one. If you perform an IP check, he already shows 3 aliases. Why would anyone need 3 aliases here? Just more of what we've all come to expect from Paul. I'm sure he's had dozens of return aliases which is pathetic IMO. I can tell you if I wasn't wanted or needed somewhere, I wouldn't waste my time posting there.

BTW, the "simpleton" and "treehugger" comment was not describing Paul...I was writing to Paul in response to what murgirl1 posted. Check out the post I was responding to and all should become clear.

I flagged two BLunist posts yesterday that were off topic and wrote that at a minimum, they should have been posted on the off topic board. Today, he's had 3 violations due to dredging up the past once again and posting off topic garbage only meant to disrupt discussion about EDIG. And his on topic tone is anti-EDIG (of course) by stating things like it is unlikely our version [of Nunchi] is being tested in cellphones though it was clearly stated during the recent conference call that Nunchi is presently in use using a CDMA network with servers in EDIG lab. So, he's calling Dr. Nunally a liar. Naturally he throws in that he's still buying shares (which we're supposed to believe) and that makes all his innuendo acceptable. Sorry, not to me.

I see other Hub Leaders are also acting on BLunist's posts by flagging and processing them. Bottom line is Paul is a disruption here, and if he continues, will get banned yet again. As simple a concept as it is, he just doesn't get it.

OK, I'm bored now. You can have the last word.