THIS IS A MUST READ AND FORWARD TO EVERYONE ON YOUR LIST. NEVER FORGET
WHAT AN UNDERHANDED, CRIMINAL EVENT HAS OCCURRED HERE!



They never stop, they will keep trying to shove this down our throats
until they get it through...pass on to everyone...


The impudent tyranny of Sen. Harry Reid
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada is proving once again the
maxim that darkness hates the light.
Buried in his massive amendment to the Senate version of Obamacare is
Reid's anti-democratic poison pill designed to prevent any future Congress
from repealing the central feature of this monstrous legislation!
Beginning on page 1,000 of the measure, Section 3403 reads in part: ". it
shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to
consider any bill, resolution, amendment or conference report that would
repeal or otherwise change this subsection."
In other words, if President Barack Obama signs this measure into law, no
future Senate or House will be able to change a single word of Section
3403, regardless whether future Americans or their representatives in
Congress wish otherwise!!
Note that the subsection at issue here concerns the regulatory power of
the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB) to "reduce the per capita
rate of growth in Medicare spending."
That is precisely the kind of open-ended grant of regulatory power that
effectively establishes the IMAB as the ultimate arbiter of the cost,
quality and quantity of health care to be made available to the American
people. And Reid wants the decisions of this group of unelected federal
bureaucrats to be untouchable for all time.
No wonder the majority leader tossed aside assurances that senators and
the public would have at least 72 hours to study the text of the final
Senate version of Obamacare before the critical vote on cloture. And no
wonder Reid was so desperate to rush his amendment through the
Senate, even scheduling the key tally on it at 1 a.m., while America
slept.
True to form, Reid wanted to keep his Section 3403 poison pill secret for
as long as possible, just as he negotiated his bribes for the votes of
Senators Mary Landrieu of Louisiana , Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Bernie
Sanders of Vermont behind closed doors.
The final Orwellian touch in this subversion of democratic procedure is
found in the ruling of the Reid-controlled Senate Parliamentarian that the
anti-repeal provision is not a change in Senate rules, but rather of
Senate "procedures." Why is that significant?
Because for 200 years, changes in the Senate's standing rules have
required approval by two-thirds of those voting, or 67 votes rather than
the 60 Reid's amendment received.
Reid has flouted two centuries of standing Senate rules to pass a measure
in the dead of night that no senator has read, and part of which can never
be changed. If this is not tyranny, then what is?