Because:

1) DM has an agreement to represent EDIG in the IP Monetization against any potential infringers;

2) EDIG has a sweet deal with DM that costs them 40% of what he gets after deduction of any costs he advances.

3) The current EDIG counsel in degicor case get paid per hour, and may not be as versed in IP litigation as DM.

4) And lastly, IMO the agreement with DM gives them an "Exclusive" as to any IP litigation, and EDIG has given DM a lien on its Patents for that. So, unless DM agrees to some other counsel representing EDIG against degicor, they have the right of refusal for any infirngement action against any company, including degicor...

Gil...