I suspect you may have a source to determine who flagged your post, but IMO, it is not a "requirement" that anyone who can view it in the manage violations tab, to publically post an answer to your question. Doing such, again IMO, can cause disputes between our members, and we have enough of that already.

Any HL who viewed it, me being one of them, could have processed the flag as "warn user" or "ignore violation" but nobody did. It was left for Agora to decide, and 3 posts were handled in this manner by their admin folks.

Flagging a post can be done by anyone, mail room included. What happens after that, is a HL can process it as warn user or ignore violation. Also, if a poster is mail room or treasurer rank, a HL can delete the post.

This "authority" given to HL's by Agora is something that I feel must be handled with no personal aspect. What I'm trying to say is, one should ignore who the author is, and judge the posts content, and if it is a rule violation, take appropriate action.

Everyone's tolerance level is different, and that is in essence the problem.

I'd rather see EDIG get above $5, then we'd not need worry about any of this.