Did you know?
You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)
Re: Pacer: e.Digital Corporation v. Utility Associates, Inc.
"......This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project......"
I wonder if this is the reason that judge was assigned to the case? I wonder if there could be a conflict...or appearance of one? I wonder which company provided the cameras? I wonder if the cameras being used even contained EDIG IP? I wonder if Handal objected to it if they did?
