Free
Message: Re: From Page 9 of 11 (IPR terminated pursuant to Settlement Doc.)
1
Jul 26, 2016 11:53AM
4
Jul 26, 2016 12:00PM

Jul 26, 2016 12:00PM
1
Jul 26, 2016 12:06PM

Jul 26, 2016 12:12PM
3
Jul 26, 2016 12:16PM
2
Jul 26, 2016 12:17PM

Jul 26, 2016 12:17PM
1
Jul 26, 2016 12:18PM

Jul 26, 2016 12:18PM
1
Jul 26, 2016 12:21PM
4
Jul 26, 2016 12:33PM
8
Jul 26, 2016 01:03PM

the current defendants received stays pending the Google IPR because filing their own would have been redundant. Now that the Google IPR has been terminated, the stays have been lifted. What would prevent any of them from filing their own IPR? Why would it require a new defendant to start a new IPR process?

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply