Free
Message: Pacer: e.Digital Corporation v. ArcSoft, Inc. 7/11/2016

"PTAB’s Decision did not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a)."

"ArcSoft proposes that the parties meet and confer and submit a proposed schedule for the remainder of this case and/or be allowed to present their positions regarding the schedule at a status conference."

ArcSoft does not have the leverage to petition for an IPR, with that, they face the civil considerations only that will focus on a precedent claims const. ruling....their options are to settle.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply