No such message found

Free
Message: Re: Patent # 15/043,529 ( Microsignet Continuation ) CLAIM
8
Jun 23, 2016 04:42PM
7
Jun 23, 2016 05:15PM
5
Jun 24, 2016 10:24AM
8
Jun 24, 2016 10:49AM
5
Jun 24, 2016 10:56AM
6
Jun 24, 2016 11:11AM
3
Jun 24, 2016 11:15AM

Jun 24, 2016 11:27AM

Jun 24, 2016 11:28AM
1
Jun 24, 2016 11:33AM
5
vic
Jun 24, 2016 01:15PM
4
Jun 24, 2016 01:32PM
2
Jun 24, 2016 02:01PM
2
vic
Jun 24, 2016 04:04PM

"BRI=broadest reasonable interpretation--if we would have added breadbox the defendants attorney could have argued that we were not being reasonable, so they stopped just short of that--LOL"

BRI could have included bread box.....

They are down to defining specifics and saying the hell with claims construction issues for certain verses to mean and include...just create more patents with specifics....and use common specifications between the patent families.

The old saying, less is more, is turning over.

doni

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply