Pacer-EDIG v. MivaTek International - Notice of Appointment of Mediator
in response to
by
No such message found
Message: IoT Evolution Expo JULY 11-14, 2016 • CAESARS PALACE • LAS VEGAS
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Notice of Appointment of Mediator
15-05795 JST MED - 1 -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California
e.Digital Corporation,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
MivaTek International, Inc.,
Defendant(s).
15-05795 JST MED
Notice of Appointment of Mediator
TO COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The court notifies the parties and counsel that the Mediator assigned to this case is:
James Gilliland
Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton, LLP
2 Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-576-0200
Counsel shall familiarize themselves with the requirements of ADR L.R. 6 which governs the Mediation program. The mediator will schedule a joint phone conference with counsel under ADR L.R. 6-6 and will set the date of the mediation session within the deadlines set by ADR L.R. 6-4 or the court order referring this action to mediation.
The court permits the mediator to charge each party its pro rata share of the cost of the phone conference.
Counsel are reminded that the written mediation statements required by the ADR L.R. 6-7 shall NOT be filed with the court.
Dated: May 3, 2016
SUSAN Y. SOONG
Clerk
by: Alice M. Fiel
/s/
ADR Case Administrator
Northern District of California
Notice of Appointment of Mediator
15-05795 JST MED - 1 -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California
e.Digital Corporation,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
MivaTek International, Inc.,
Defendant(s).
15-05795 JST MED
Notice of Appointment of Mediator
TO COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The court notifies the parties and counsel that the Mediator assigned to this case is:
James Gilliland
Kilpatrick, Townsend & Stockton, LLP
2 Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-576-0200
Counsel shall familiarize themselves with the requirements of ADR L.R. 6 which governs the Mediation program. The mediator will schedule a joint phone conference with counsel under ADR L.R. 6-6 and will set the date of the mediation session within the deadlines set by ADR L.R. 6-4 or the court order referring this action to mediation.
The court permits the mediator to charge each party its pro rata share of the cost of the phone conference.
Counsel are reminded that the written mediation statements required by the ADR L.R. 6-7 shall NOT be filed with the court.
Dated: May 3, 2016
SUSAN Y. SOONG
Clerk
by: Alice M. Fiel
/s/
ADR Case Administrator
16 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply