"conflicting decisions among panels"

?

Are you considering that arbitration between opposing parties (PTAB aside) will in effect eliminate conflicting decisions of PTAB panels or create it?

As the PTAB panel will not be involved in an aberration process, I do not understand how PTAB panels would have conflicting decisions..

Are they or are they not, in effect, through arbitration between the parties allowing the parties to determine the viability of a patent?

What's the subject matter between the parties about?

IMVHO, abbertration between the parties is going to be about who bends in the wind first with the threat of moving forward with a PTAB process.

This abbertration solves nothing if parties agree to whatever resolutions are on the table. It's nothing more than a pair of boxers going to their respective corners (actually the boxer walks away while we wait for the next participant) while they wait for a final decision of viability.

I'm looking for a knock out in the first round with the first contestant. We've already gone through this type aberrational threat process in the civil system. (IPR's of Intel, Micron, Microsemi).

Realizing AIA is a junk process, should we walk away while waiting for the supreme beings to straighten out this mess? How many years will that take?

This whole AIA mess is nothing more than a time killing consideration to dilute patents. Congress does not care if AIA is right or wrong and neither does the PTO....All they are considering is that the public can take them to time consuming court over the unfair issues.

Patents are worthless as long as AIA is in effect with its threatening and time consuming ambitions.

doni