Re: IPR Notice 21
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 20, 2016 11:18AM
"this is the excerpt that Plank liked: in his opinion of course,"
"During the call, the parties agreed to Patent Owner’s filing of corrected papers in each of the present proceedings within three (3) business days, and if the papers are not defective, Petitioner agreed not to oppose the pro hac vice admission of Mr. Handal and not to object to Mr. Handal’s conducting the ongoing deposition on behalf of the Patent Owner."
Plank...
Petitioner had no reason not to except based on "papers are not defective" or otherwise...
Mary was standing by...
They did us no favor
doni