Re: Pacer - Strong Handal responsive claim construction briefs ( EDIG v. Arcsoft )
posted on
Dec 22, 2015 09:52PM
It is amazing how quickly ArcSolft raises the issue of COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL in its pending Markman based upon the November 30, 2015 Dropcam Opinions. However, IMHO Team Handal learning from the missteps of the Flash Patent Portfolio Markman Opinion in Colorado not being addressed during its litigation rendered that Opinion final. We were bound by the Collateral Estoppel Doctrine from relitigating the affected patent again in other cases. Handal in his brief with ArcSolft speaks to specific Claim Terms in the Newly Granted Patents that would provide evidence that could challange or change the Opinion of Judge Tigar. This Dropcam case is ongoing and not Settled or Desolved meaning a finality causing team Handle to be Estopped from litigating the merits of the Patents has not occured. Handle asserting various patents against various posible infringers at various stages of litigation is nothing short of brillant being skilled in the art of litigation. IMHO Electricity is in the Air as we close 2015 and enter 2016 next week.