adistrict court and an IPR, predicting how each forum’s
claim constructions might affect the other’s is a key
strategic question. Each forum applies a different claim
construction standard and uses a different claim construction
procedure. This could lead to different constructions
of the same claim in a district court litigation
and an IPR. Despite these differences and potential
conflicts—or because of them—each forum is likely to
consider the constructions of the other."

Likely = precedence

sman...that is why I made the comment....


"sman...pondering your recent post on how important claims construction is for IPR reviews, be the PTAB do it or the civil court do it...I'm still trying to figure why a claims ruling is important....for this case.

In any event, it's done and over with for whatever worth it does lend for an IPR review."

My question is still about the context of the claims ruling and why that is important?

No biggie...thanks.

doni