Whats is the difference between MOTION to Quash & protective order
in response to
by
Message: e.Digital Corporation v. Micron Technology ~ MOTION to Quash
Joe , agree these are all legal jargon for delaying tactic.
Quash is "to make void"A motion to quash is often used for suppressing service of a summons/complaint or warrant or other legal proceedings (discovery of evidence) due to such things as lack of jurisdiction, wrong identification of a person, unlawful basis, keeping confidential files secret, etc.
Protective Order
A manufacturer has a legitimate interest in protecting its trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information. The relevancy and reliability of information obtained during discovery has not been subjected to judicial scrutiny and might never be disclosed at trial. Clearly, the release of inaccurate, unreliable or misleading information could unfairly damage the manufacturer's reputation and alarm the public unnecessarily. (Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, supra, 467 U.S. at p. 35.)
9 Recommendations
Loading...
Loading...
New Message
Please
login
to post a reply