Free
Message: Re: IPR decision denied
17
Apr 27, 2015 04:26PM
7
Apr 27, 2015 05:20PM
4
Apr 27, 2015 07:11PM
15
Apr 27, 2015 07:37PM
8
Apr 27, 2015 07:40PM
4
Apr 27, 2015 07:48PM
15
Apr 27, 2015 09:20PM
8
Apr 28, 2015 08:08AM
5
Apr 28, 2015 09:25AM

Flow of property administration from an owner to Entities under LAW...under Law you have the right to be self motivated and you take on the task with a status of responsibility...

..................................._________OWNER

owner____________

..................................._________REPRESENATIVE

OWNER and REPRESENTATIVE are not interchangeable or relational in any manner. They are representations of two distinct issues in the statute as to patent prosecution matters....and not ownership.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Our governing statute regarding service provides that a petition for inter

partes review may be considered only if “the petitioner provides copies of any of

the documents required under paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) to the patent owner or, if

applicable, the designated representative of the patent owner.” 35 U.S.C.

§ 312(a)(5)."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do not confuse owner with OWNER. Micron filed improperly with owner through Handal.

doni

7
Apr 28, 2015 11:46AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply