Free
Message: Re: Micron defendant...doni.......
17
Apr 22, 2015 08:53AM
9
Apr 22, 2015 12:20PM
7
Apr 22, 2015 12:36PM
4
Apr 22, 2015 12:41PM
7
Apr 22, 2015 01:20PM
6
Apr 22, 2015 02:39PM
43
Apr 22, 2015 07:32PM
17
Apr 22, 2015 07:48PM
8
Apr 22, 2015 07:48PM
23
Apr 22, 2015 08:40PM
15
Apr 22, 2015 08:54PM
7
Apr 22, 2015 09:01PM
13
Apr 22, 2015 09:15PM
13
Apr 22, 2015 10:06PM
5
Apr 23, 2015 05:14AM
13
Apr 23, 2015 11:31AM
24
Apr 23, 2015 11:59AM
20
Apr 23, 2015 12:08PM
12
Apr 23, 2015 12:50PM
8
Apr 23, 2015 02:05PM
5
Apr 23, 2015 02:24PM
3
Apr 23, 2015 02:27PM

"She did not deny Micron or suggest that it SHOULD NOT FILE APPEALS IF IT LOST but she definitely stated she wanted an end to this case and not have it drawn out "years' with appeals.....That was so evident in her statements to Micron'

That may be, however IMO, the decisions made hinders e.Digital greatly...she has no choice if Micron uses the crutch she allowed them...in fair contest.

IMVHO Handal should, if possible, motion for re-consideration of the ruling.....with the alternative he suggested in his response...

V. ALTERNATIVELY, IF THE COURT IS INCLINED TO GRANT LEAVE TO AMEND, ALL DATES SHOULD BE RESET

Alternatively, if leave to amend is granted, e.Digital respectfully requests that the Court continue all of the discovery related dates and trial related dates for 90 days. Previously, the Defendants indicated that they were willing to provide any accommodation to Plaintiff if leave to amend were granted to include but not limited to continuing the dates in this matter. The Defendants, among other places, indicated this during one or more of Judge Skomal’s meet and confer telephonic discovery conferences. As such, Defendants should not oppose such a request.

I say the judge bring it on...allow the amend and allow e.Digital the time to set up the defence.

IMVHO...Micron is pulling a bluff...

doni


8
Apr 23, 2015 03:39PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply