I just think we have seen from the last CC (12 points) considering both side entered briefs, I think that's what they are called, her mind was made up before the verbal presentation from both sides.

I mean, hand down a decision the very next business/court day?

Sunpoop's report shows that the judge was balking at the defendant, shooting them down. Things like...

"I think the plaintiff has the better side of that argument".

Micron wished the judge to believe the 445 definition was the correct one and not the 108 definition. The judge pondered a bit, looked at her paperwork some then asked Micron "Isn't 108 a seperate and different patent than 445? The Micron atty admitted it was, and the judge then asked why he was trying to insert 445's definition into 108....As Mr. Handal stated "he had no answer"

She made it clear the last go around re: 12 claims the 108 was a separate patent, when this trick was tried on 774.

Hoping for our Pacer boys to prove my gut...lol.